As internet use has grown, many paper maps have been scanned and published online, and new maps have increasingly been designed for viewing in a web browser or mobile app. Web maps may be static or dynamic, and dynamic maps may either be animated or interactive. Tiled web maps are interactive maps that use tiled images to allow for fast data loading and smooth interaction, while vector web maps support rendering a wide variety of map designs on the client. Web maps follow a client-server architecture, with specialized map servers sometimes used to publish data and maps as geospatial web services. Web maps are composed of data from a database or file on the server, style information rendered on either server or client, and optionally animation or interaction instructions executed on the client. Several graphic web platforms provide user-friendly web mapping solutions, while greater customization is possible through the user of commercial or open source web mapping APIs. When designing web maps, cartographers should consider the map’s purpose on a continuum from exploratory and highly interactive to thematic and less interactive or static, the constraints of desktop and/or mobile web contexts, and accessibility for disabled, elderly, and poorly connected users.
web map: A map that is published and accessed via the internet, usually as part of a web page. Web maps fall into one of two categories:
static web maps are map images rendered in the browser that do not change given user input. These include map images that the user can increase or decrease in scale via zoom functionality in the browser without changing the image itself.
dynamic web maps are web maps that change appearance as they are viewed by the user. There are two sub-types of dynamic maps:
animated web maps change frequently and automatically, using time to represent one or more data attributes. Animated maps may or may not include interactivity, but often at least include controls allowing the user to pause, play, and adjust the starting point of the animation.
interactive web maps change in response to user input. Because of the ubiquity of this type of map on the internet today, many people casually think of “web maps” as synonymous with interactive web maps.
tiled web map (slippy map): An interactive web map that uses image or data tiles sent to the user's browser on demand, allowing for smooth, uninterrupted zooming and panning.
mashup: the combination of a set of map tiles with one or more data overlays from a different source or sources than the tileset.
application programming interface (API): A set of instructions that programs use to communicate with one another, often published in human-readable, online documentation.
commercial web mapping API: A library of code instructions that is primarily or exclusively useful for accessing a proprietary web mapping service.
open source web mapping API: A library of code instructions that is not designed with a specific service in mind and which any developer can freely alter to suit their purposes.
rich internet application (applet): A third-party application designed to compile and run binary programs in the browser. Rich internet applications are quickly disappearing in favor of open web technologies.
client-server architecture: A system allowing computers to communicate with each other across a network, in which one computer program (the server) stores and delivers content to a receiving program (the client).
server: A piece of software installed on a computer or group of computers that sends information stored on the local machine to a remote device.
client: A piece of software installed on a computer that sends requests to and receives information from a server.
Document Object Model (DOM): The collection of elements, attributes, styles, data, and script objects and procedures used to view a web page in the browser.
map server: A specialized web server used to publish geospatial web services.
geospatial web services: Data, map images, and processing services made available in real-time by a map server, usually conforming to standards set forth by the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC).
vector tiles. Small chunks of vector data each covering the geographic area of a single map tile delivered with a separate set of style instructions that is used to render each tile in the browser.
stop-frame animation: Animation created by displaying many individual images (or frames) in rapid succession.
tweening: A smooth transition between map states executed programmatically (i.e., through code).
interaction:The conversation between the user and the map mediated by the client.
user interface (UI): The set of elements on the page that the user can see and/or manipulate.
visual hierarchy: The relative visual dominance of objects on a map, with more important objects being more visually dominant.
strong visual hierarchy: Objects on the map contrast distinctly and have a very recognizable order of importance.
weak/flat visual hierarchy: Objects on the map are visually comparable and difficult to order in terms of relative importance.
overdesign: The inclusion of too much information, too many visual elements, or too much interactivity given the map’s purpose, resulting in clutter and reduced usability.
map layout: The visual arrangement of user interface (UI) elements on and around a web map.
map composition: The way in which web maps are visually structured to communicate certain information to the user.
responsive web design: A set of techniques for modifying the layout of web page content to conform to the user’s display size and context.
accessibility: The principle of ensuring that people who have disabilities, are older, or live in rural areas or developing countries can use websites and web applications.
2.1 Static vs. dynamic web maps
The first web maps were printed maps that were simply scanned and posted to the internet as early as 1993, when the introduction of the Mosaic web browser allowed early internet users to view images for the first time (Peterson, 2008). Scanned map images are still a common type of web map; often these are delivered as Adobe PDF documents or placed within a viewing frame that allows the user to zoom in to view parts of the map in greater detail (Peterson, 2014). In recent years, though, increasing attention has been paid to the design constraints of computer displays and web browsers, and there are now a host of design guidelines for digital maps that depart from those for print maps (e.g., Jenny et al., 2008; Muehlenhaus, 2014; Tolochko, 2016). Whether printed first and then scanned, or created on a computer for digital consumption, a web map that does not change its appearance is classified as a static web map (Figure 1).
Figure 1: A portion of a static map formatted for the web. The full map is very long (1097x8032 pixels) to facilitate vertical scrolling on a web page. Map by Gregor Aisch and K.K. Rebecca Lai, from The New York Times, last updated February 7, 2017. Reprinted with permission.
The development of dynamic web maps has taken place parallel to the proliferation of static web maps. Dynamic web maps change their appearance, either frequently and automatically to show change in a phenomenon (animated web maps; Figure 2) or arbitrarily in response to user input (interactive web maps) (Roth, 2013). The Map Viewer website, developed in 1994, allowed the user to request a unique map centered on a specific point (Peterson, 2014). In 1996, MapQuest introduced a map that users could zoom in and out of and pan side to side, with each request loading a new web page with the new map view. About a decade later, MapQuest was eclipsed by Google, which introduced the tiled web map in 2005.
Figure 2: An animated web map of flight tracks taken by government surveillance planes. The original map also provides some interactions. Map by Peter Aldhous, from BuzzFeed News, April 6, 2016. Reprinted with permission.
2.2 Tiled web maps and mashups
Figure 3. A map tile from OpenStreetMap, a tiled reference map composed of data from hundreds of thousands of contributors.
Along with tiled web maps, Google invented and standardized the Web Mercator (or Spherical Mercator) projection, which is still used by almost all tilesets. This projection is useful because of its simple computation, rectangularity (allowing the map to be continuous east-to-west), and conformality, which reduces shape distortion at large scales (Muehlenhaus, 2014). However, it is also less accurate than ellipsoidal projections, and it greatly distorts high-latitude areas at the global scale, leading to concerns over its impact on how people imagine the planet’s shape and interpret areal data (Battersby et al., 2014).
The advent of the tiled web map was shortly followed by the first mashup. By reverse-engineering the Google Maps website, ‘map hackers’ figured out how to put data from elsewhere on top of Google’s image tiles (Crampton, 2010). Google responded by openly publishing its application programming interface (API), a set of instructions programs use to communicate with one another (Muehlenhaus, 2014). While OpenLayers was soon developed as a non-commercial alternative, Google Maps API remained the most used mashup generator until Google began limiting its unpaid usage in 2011. At that point, open source alternatives rapidly gained in popularity.
2.3 Rich internet applications and vector web maps
Prior to the advent of tiled web maps, cartographers who sought smooth animation and interaction began making maps using rich internet applications, or third-party binary applications embedded in the browser as an extension (often called an applet). The most common of these for mapping was Flash, developed by Macromedia in 1997 and later purchased by Adobe (Peterson, 2008). By downloading and compiling as a single executable package, programs built with Flash could overcome the bandwidth limitations of 56K modems to provide a smooth user experience with high-quality rendering of custom graphics (Roth et al., 2014). Flash maps were common until the early 2010s, when mobile operating system makers announced they would no longer support third-party applications in mobile browsers, and the web development community moved toward sole reliance on open web technologies implemented natively by browsers (Adobe Corporate Communications, 2015).
Figure 4. An interactive vector web map allowing exploration of historic ship captains’ logs. Map by Scott Farley, Starr Moss, and Meghan Kelly. Reprinted with permission.
3.1 Client-Server Architecture
The word “server” has become shorthand for a high-power computer, often one that sits in a data center with hundreds of other similar machines (Peterson, 2014). More precisely, a server is a piece of software that can be located on any computer, even a home PC or laptop, that makes the contents of a certain directory on that computer visible to a network. The most popular servers currently are Apache, NGINX, Google Web Server, and Microsoft’s IIS (Netcraft, 2017).
On the client side, the browser renders pages and executes programs sent to it using the Document Object Model (DOM), which organizes all the elements, attributes, styles, data, and script objects and procedures needed to view the web page (Sack and Roth, 2017). In addition to the current set of fully-featured web browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Internet Explorer/Edge, Safari, and Opera), web maps are increasingly being viewed on mobile devices using apps developed to tap into a particular internet service. Google Maps and Apple Maps are the best-known map apps, but there are many others, and cartographers with basic coding skills can build their own for distribution through OS makers’ app stores (Muehlenhaus, 2014).
The basic ingredients of a web map are data, representation of the data using style information, and, if a dynamic map, animation or interaction (Donohue, 2014). Each will be covered in turn below.
Data is hosted on the server’s machine. Vector data used to dynamically render web maps is often stored in a database. The most common database management systems used for the web (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Microsoft SQL, and Oracle) all have geospatial extensions that allow for the storage of geographic vector data, as well as a varying ability to do server-side geoprocessing with the data (Lienert et al., 2012). Vector data may also be stored in a file on the server, or converted from a database to a file format for transmission. It is important to note that vector data used in web maps typically does not include projection information, as most web mapping APIs project the data in the client application, and pre-projected data can generate incomprehensible results.
Raster map images (including raster tiles) are almost always stored as individual files in a simple directory structure. Table 1 lists common vector and raster file formats for the web (see also Raster Formats and Sources and Vector Formats and Sources).
|GML||.gml||Geographic Markup Language; an XML-based Open Geospatial Consortium standard for storing spatial vector data and transmitting web feature services (see section 2.3) (Stefanakis and Patroumpas, 2008)|
|KML||.kml||Keyhole Markup Language; an XML-based format used by Google Earth and Google Maps API. KMZ files are zipped KMLs. (Stefanakis and Patroumpas, 2008)|
|SVG||.svg||Scalable Vector Graphics; an XML-based W3C open web standard vector graphics format that seamlessly integrates with HTML. SVG can be drawn from georeferenced data, but cannot store geospatial coordinates. (Lienert et al., 2012)|
|JSON-based format that encodes geospatial topology. Greatly reduces file size over GeoJSON and enables line simplification. (Bostock and Davies, 2013)|
|Esri Shapefile||several (.shp, .shx. .dbf, .prj, etc.)||The most common data format for desktop GIS, but does not integrate well with open web standards. Upload and download of zipped shapefiles are supported by many web mapping applications. (Esri, 2017)|
|JPEG||.jpg, .jpeg||Joint Photographic Experts Group; raster image format with large color range and robust compression. Best suited for photographs and remotely sensed imagery. (Peterson, 2014)|
|PNG||.png||Portable Network Graphics; raster image format with lossless compression and good edge rendering. Best suited for linework. (Peterson, 2014)|
|GIF||.gif||Graphics Interchange Format; an early, compact web graphics format limited to 206 colors that supports brief, non-interactive animations.|
|PDF, GeoPDF||Portable Document Format; print-optimized raster and/or vector graphics rendered by browser plug-ins as well as widely available desktop applications and mobile apps. Allows image layers to be turned on and off, creating limited interactivity. GeoPDF is an extension of PDF that allows georeferencing information to be included. (Muehlenhaus, 2014).|
The representation aspect of a web map is how the mapped information is seen and interpreted by the user (Donohue, 2014). It involves the application of style information to the data to render a visible map image. This rendering may take place on either the server or client side.
In the case of raster map images, the style information is included in the image provided by the server. The map images may either be preexisting files or rendered by a specialized map server using a Styled Layer Descriptor (SLD) stylesheet (Lienert et al., 2012). Map servers can be set up to render images on-the-fly as requested by the client, or render each image once and store it in a server-side cache. Raster tilesets for tiled maps are typically created using the latter approach. MapServer, Geoserver, and QGIS Server are popular open source map servers, while ArcGIS Server is the most widely used commercial map server.
Map servers publish data and images as geospatial web services. The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) maintains a set of standards for geospatial web services, listed in Table 2 with the name of each service linked to its documentation on the OGC website. These standards allow clients to query the map server’s data and operations to produce a custom result, and they immediately update with changes to the underlying data, allowing for real-time cartographic representation of changing phenomena (Cerba & Cepicky, 2012).
|Web Map Service||Publishes static, whole raster map images rendered by the map server using an SLD stylesheet.|
|Web Map Tile Service||Publishes raster image tilesets rendered by the map server for use in tiled web maps.|
|Web Feature Service||Publishes vector data in GML format.|
|Web Coverage Service||Publishes coverages, or geospatial information representing space/time varying phenomena.|
|Web Processing Service||Specifies rules for client requests and inputs for geoprocessing on a server and for server responses.|
3.4 Animation and Interaction
Tiled web maps create smooth map interaction through the use of AJAX (see Section 1.2). While AJAX revolutionized how web pages are programmed, its major drawback is the requirement for continuous network connectivity, making most tiled web maps unusable where internet service is spotty or unavailable (Tsou, 2011).
3.5 Web Mapping Platforms and APIs
Increasingly user-friendly, cloud-based web applications have brought web mapping within the reach of technical novices (Muehlenhaus, 2014). These services allow users to add data to preexisting base maps, style the data, add interactive components, and host the final product for direct sharing or embedding in a web page. Several popular web mapping services are listed in Table 3.
|Mapbox Studio||Styles and hosts custom vector tilesets using OpenStreetMap and user-imported datasets.|
|CARTO Builder||Hosts geospatial data in PostgreSQL/PostGIS database, maps data on a wide range of tilesets, styles data layers, creates visualizations, allows data queries, and performs spatial analysis.|
|Google My Maps||Allows drawing or adding data layers on Google tilesets and provides limited data styling.|
|Google Fusion Tables||Georeferences and maps tabular data on Google tilesets, allows limited data styling, and creates visualizations.|
|Esri's ArcGIS Online Map Viewer||Allows drawing or adding and styling data layers on ESRI and open-licensed tilesets. Allows spatial analysis and access to curated datasets with enterprise subscription.|
|Google Maps API||Provides access to Google Maps tilesets and services.|
|Bing Maps Control||Provides access to Bing Maps tilesets and services.|
|HERE Maps API||Provides access to HERE Maps tilesets and services.|
|ArcGIS API||Allows mashups, spatial analysis, and visualization of Esri tilesets.|
|CARTO.js||Provides access to data and visualization stored on CARTO.|
|Mapbox GL JS||Renders Mapbox vector tiles with UI controls and interactions.|
|Mapzen Tangram||Renders Mapzen vector tiles, using Leaflet for controls and interactions.|
|OpenLayers||Robust open source library for tiled map mashups on any tilesets.|
|Leaflet||Lightweight open source library for tiled map mashups on any tilesets.|
|D3||Open source library for dynamic vector mapping and data visualization.|
The purpose of this section is outline the unique design constraints of web maps without rehashing the cartographic principles presented in other CV topics, which remain relevant to web maps.
4.1 Map Purpose
Following the Swoopy diagram (DiBiase, 1990; see Cartography and Technology), web maps can be placed along a continuum from highly exploratory to highly thematic (Figure 5; see User Interface and User Experience (UI/UX) Design).
Figure 5. The web map continuum.
Visual hierarchy is the relative visual dominance of objects on the map, such that more important objects are more visually dominant (Dent, 1990). Because they display many features that may be of interest, more exploratory web maps should have a flatter visual hierarchy to allow users greater freedom to draw their own conclusions. They should also allow for more interaction to enable the user to create more unique map views (MacEachren, 1994). By contrast, thematic maps should have a strong visual hierarchy and few if any interactions to keep the user’s focus on the key information being presented (Figure 6).
Figure 6. The National Map download tool (top) provides a large amount of data for exploration, includes many possible interactions, and symbolizes map layers to create a flattened visual hierarchy. In contrast, the thematic New York Times map shown in Figure 1 (bottom) contains no interaction and highlights important information with bold symbolization, labels, and callouts atop a washed-out base map, creating a strong visual hierarchy.
Web maps should avoid overdesign. To maximize its clarity and usability, a web map should only include the information, map elements, and interactions necessary to accomplish the map’s purpose (Tolochko, 2016).
4.2 Map Elements
Web map elements should have a consistent look across the base map, data, and user interface layers of the map, and fit with the overall page or app design (Tolochko, 2016). The sizes and resolutions of device screens vary widely and affect how web maps appear to the user (Muehlenhaus, 2014). A web map should adjust its layout dynamically to fit the available display space of any device it is intended for use on, following the strategies of responsive web design (Jenny et al., 2008; Marcotte, 2011). Additionally, different browsers and operating systems have slight differences in how they display web pages, so web maps should be tested on several different platforms before release. Table 5 presents a summary of map-based UI elements and common implementation schemes.
Web map implementation(s)
Page header or temporary splash screen.
May be dynamically adjusted through panning/zooming, changes to screen size, and device orientation.
Provides geographic context. Use muted colors in thematic web maps to create strong visual hierarchy (Figure 5). Including a satellite imagery layer is appropriate for exploratory and reference web maps, but distracting in thematic maps.
Exploratory maps include many data layers with a flatter visual hierarchy; thematic web maps include a few styled to stand out against base map (Figure 6). Point symbols should be highly iconic so they can be distinguished when small. Thematic layers should be easy to interpret and avoid possible hidden meanings (see Common Thematic Map Types).
May be displayed through a scale bar that changes dynamically if the map can be zoomed or panned. Do not display a ratio scale, as absolute scale changes with display size and projection centering.
Embedded text, links, images, graphics, and videos that may be presented as information windows, tooltips atop the map, and/or elsewhere on the web page. Provides a point of entry for the map user.
Quantity and size of labels can change at different zoom levels. Labels should be large enough for pixel densities of intended users’ displays and use sans-serif, common web fonts.
If included in an interactive map, changes dynamically to match the current view.
At minimum, include the cartographer(s)’ name(s), data sources, and license information. It can be shown in small font directly on or below the map or made easily available in a splash screen or on a linked webpage.
Do not include in a static web map oriented with north up. If a web map can rotate, it should include an arrow that also rotates dynamically.
Neat lines / frame lines
Not included if map takes up the full size of the screen or is well-integrated with the rest of the page content.
Graphs or charts may be linked to a thematic map through simultaneous highlighting or brushing.
For dynamic maps, may update dynamically or allow interactions that affect the map.
May be included to provide the map user with additional options and interactions.
May be provided as a link or tutorial pop-ups to orient the user to the map.
May be included to give the user control over playback. They should integrate a temporal legend. Keep animations short and simple (see Mapping Time).
Should be included to facilitate interactions or when mouse/touch/ keyboard interactions are not immediately obvious. They should provide feedback to the user when activated (see User Experience and User Experience (UIUX) Design). On highly interactive maps, include a mechanism to reset the default view and parameters. Avoid interactions that interfere with web page scrolling.
Accessibility for the web means that people who have disabilities, are older, or live in rural areas or developing countries can use websites and web applications (W3C, 2016). Web maps should follow the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) to the greatest extent possible. For example, web maps can provide alt tags for images to be read by screen readers, use proper heading levels for titles, and allow keyboard input options for interactions. Styling should take colorblind users into account. Interactive web maps that rely on newer technologies or those with large datasets should provide alternative versions that can be viewed with slower connection speeds and older, non-conforming browsers (Tolochko, 2016).
Adobe Corporate Communications. (2015, November 30). Flash, HTML5 and open web standards [Blog]. Retrieved March 10, 2017, from https://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2015/11/flash-html5-and-open-web-standards.html
Battersby, S. E., Finn, M. P., Usery, E. L., & Yamamoto, K. H. (2014). Implications of Web Mercator and Its Use in Online Mapping. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 49(2), 85-101. DOI: 10.3138/carto.49.2.2313
Bostock, M., & Davies, J. (2013). Code as Cartography. The Cartographic Journal, 50(2), 129-135. DOI: 10.1179/0008704113Z.00000000078
Caballero, L. (2011, October 13). An Introduction to WebGL - Part 1. Retrieved from https://dev.opera.com/articles/introduction-to-webgl-part-1/
Cerba, O., & Cepicky, J. (2012). Web Services for Thematic Maps. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), Online Maps with APIs and WebServices (pp. 141-155). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Crampton, J. (2010). Mapping: A Critical Introduction to Cartography and GIS. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dent, B. D. (1990). Cartography: thematic map design (2nd ed). Dubuque, IA: W.C. Brown.
DiBiase, D. (1990). Visualization in the Earth Sciences. Earth and Mineral Sciences, 59(2). Retrieved from http://www.geovista.psu.edu/publications/others/dibiase90/swoopy.html
Donohue, R. G. (2014). Web Cartography with Web Standards: Teaching, Learning, and Using Open Source Web Mapping Technologies (Dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
ESRI. (2017). Shapefiles. Retrieved March 13, 2017, from http://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-online/reference/shapefiles.htm
Jenny, B., Jenny, H., & Räber, S. (2008). Map design for the Internet. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), International Perspectives on Maps and the Internet (pp. 31-48). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
Lienert, C., Jenny, B., Schnabel, O., & Hurni, L. (2012). Current Trends in Vector-Based Internet Mapping: A Technical Review. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), Online Maps with APIs and Web Services (pp. 23-36). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
MacEachren, A. M. (1994). Visualization in modern cartography: Setting the Agenda. In A. M. MacEachren & D. R. F. Taylor (Eds.), Visualization in Modern Cartography (pp. 1-12). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Muehlenhaus, I. (2014). Web cartography: map design for interactive and mobile devices. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Netcraft. (2017, February 27). February 2017 Web Server Survey. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from https://news.netcraft.com/archives/2017/02/27/february-2017-web-server-survey.html
Peterson, M. P. (2008). International Perspectives on Maps and the Internet: An Introduction. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), International Perspectives on Maps and the Internet (pp. 3-10). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Peterson, M. P. (2012). The Tile-Based Mapping Transition in Cartography. In L. Zentai & J. Reyes Nunez (Eds.), Maps for the Future: Children, Education and Internet (pp. 151-163). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Peterson, M. P. (2014). Mapping in the cloud. New York ; London: The Guilford Press.
Peterson, M. P., & International Cartographic Association (Eds.). (2003). Maps and the internet (1st ed). Amsterdam : London: Elsevier.
Roth, R. E. (2012). Cartographic Interaction Primitives: Framework and Synthesis. The Cartographic Journal, 49(4), 376-395. DOI: 10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000019
Roth, R. E. (2013). Interactive maps: What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Spatial Information Science, (6). DOI: 10.5311/JOSIS.2013.6.105
Roth, R. E., Donohue, R. G., Sack, C. M., Wallace, T. R., & Buckingham, T. M. A. (2014). A Process for Keeping Pace with Evolving Web Mapping Technologies. Cartographic Perspectives, 0(78), 25-52. DOI: 10.14714/CP78.1273
Sack, C. M. (2013). Mapmaking for Change: Online Participatory Mapping Tools for Revealing Landscape Values in the Bad River Watershed (Master’s Thesis). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Sack, C. M., & Roth, R. E. (2017). Design and evaluation of an Open Web Platform cartography lab curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 1-23. DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2016.1241987
Stefanakis, E., & Patroumpas, K. (2008). Google Earth and XML: Advanced Visualization and Publishing of Geographic Information. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), International Perspectives on Maps and the Internet (pp. 143-152). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Tolochko, R. C. (2016). Contemporary Professional Practices in Interactive Web Map Design (Thesis). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Tsou, M.-H. (2011). Revisiting Web Cartography in the United States: the Rise of User-Centered Design. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 38(3), 250-257. DOI: 10.1559/15230406382250
Turner, A. (2015, July 20). Vector Tiles preview. Retrieved from https://blogs.esri.com/esri/arcgis/2015/07/20/vector-tiles-preview/
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium). (2016). Accessibility. Retrieved March 17, 2017, from https://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility
- Identify examples of static, animated, and interactive web maps.
- Explain client-server network architecture.
- Explain how a tiled map mashup is created.
- Use a geospatial web service in a map or GIS project.
- Identify the sources of data, representation, and animation or interaction in an example web map and the roles played by each.
- Critique the usability of existing web maps, including visual design choices, user interface, and interaction affordances and feedbacks.
- Determine a web map's intended purpose and assess its use of visual hierarchy and interaction based on that purpose.
- Design, construct, and publish an interactive web map.
- Format the styling, text, layout, image resolution, and file type of a static map so that it can be included in a well-designed web page.
- Publish a web map service or web map tile service.
- What is the difference between a static web map, a dynamic web map, and an interactive web map?
- What is a map server?
- In the context of web mapping, what is a client?
- How does a tiled web map use AJAX?
- What are at least three ways data can be delivered to the client in a web map?
- What is representation in a web map, and how do you create it?
- How are OGC web services useful for web mapping?
- Why might you decide to create an animated web map instead of an interactive one?
- When should a web map include many possible interactions? When should it include few or none?
- Why might a web map with many data layers (and thus greater visual complexity) use a weaker visual hierarchy than one with just a few?
- If you are designing a web map for both desktop and mobile devices, how might the layout differ on different screen sizes?
- If you are designing a web map for users in developing countries, what constraints are important to consider?
- Jenny, B., Jenny, H., & Räber, S. (2008). Map design for the Internet. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), International Perspectives on Maps and the Internet (pp. 31-48). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
- Muehlenhaus, I. (2014). Web cartography: map design for interactive and mobile devices. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Peterson, M. P. (2014). Mapping in the cloud. New York ; London: The Guilford Press.
- Peterson, M. P., & International Cartographic Association (Eds.). (2003). Maps and the internet (1st ed). Amsterdam : London: Elsevier.
- Roth, R. E., Donohue, R. G., Sack, C. M., Wallace, T. R., & Buckingham, T. M. A. (2014). A Process for Keeping Pace with Evolving Web Mapping Technologies. Cartographic Perspectives, 0(78), 25-52. DOI: 10.14714/CP78.1273
- Sack, C. M., & Roth, R. E. (2017). Design and evaluation of an Open Web Platform cartography lab curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 1-23. DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2016.1241987
- Tolochko, R. C. (2016). Contemporary Professional Practices in Interactive Web Map Design (Thesis). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
- W3C (World Wide Web Consortium). (2016). Accessibility. Retrieved March 17, 2017, from https://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility