You are currently viewing an archived version of Topic .
If updates or revisions have been published you can find them at .
Author and Citation Info:
DiBiase, D., DeMers, M., Johnson, A., Kemp, K., Luck, A. T., Plewe, B., and Wentz, E. (2006). Workflow analysis and design. The Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers. (2nd Quarter 2016, first digital).
Learning Objectives:
Compare and contrast various methods for modeling workflows, including narratives, flowcharts, and UML
Compare and contrast the relative merits of various software design methods, including traditional procedural designs, object-oriented design, the Rational Unified Process, Extreme Programming, and the Unified Software Development Process
Transform traditional workflows into computer-assisted workflows leveraging geospatial technologies to an appropriate degree
Discuss the degree to which structured and unstructured tasks can be automated
Differentiate between structured and unstructured tasks
You are currently viewing an archived version of Topic . If updates or revisions have been published you can find them at .
DiBiase, D., DeMers, M., Johnson, A., Kemp, K., Luck, A. T., Plewe, B., and Wentz, E. (2006). Workflow analysis and design. The Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers. (2nd Quarter 2016, first digital).